Interprofessional Care Models Research Articles

Integrating Oral Health Care into Primary Care Well Child Visits: An Interprofessional Model of Care

Integrating Oral Health Care into Primary Care Well Child Visits: An Interprofessional Model of Care

Recreating the village: the patient experience with a hybrid model of Group Perinatal Care (GPPC) in an academic family health team

BackgroundGroup prenatal care (GPC) has been shown to have a positive impact on social support, patient knowledge and preparedness for birth. We developed an interprofessional hybrid model of care whereby the group perinatal care (GPPC) component was co-facilitated by midwives (MW) and family medicine residents (FMR) and alternating individual visits were provided by family physicians (FP’s) within our academic family health team (FHT) In this qualitative study, we sought to explore the impact of this program and how it supports patients through pregnancy and the early newborn period.MethodsQualitative study that was conducted using semi-structured telephone interviews with 18 participants who had completed GPPC in the Mount Sinai Academic Family Health Team in Toronto, Canada and delivered between November 2016 and October 2018. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was conducted by team members using grounded theory.ResultsFour over-arching themes emerged from the data: (i) Participants highly valued information they received from multiple trusted sources, (ii) Participants felt well cared for by the collaborative and coordinated interprofessional team, (iii) The design of GPPC enabled a shared experience, allowing for increased support of the pregnant person, and (iv) GPPC facilitated a supportive transition into the community which positively impacted participants’ emotional well- being.ConclusionsThe four constructs of social support (emotional, informational, instrumental and appraisal) were central to the value that participants found in GPPC. This support from the team of healthcare providers, peers and partners had a positive impact on participants’ mental health and helped them face the challenges of their transition to parenthood.

Nurse-Led Care Coordination in a Transitional Clinic for Uninsured Patients With Diabetes.

The purpose of this article is to inform the reader of the practice of the registered nurse care coordinator (RNCC) within an interprofessional, nurse-led clinic serving uninsured diabetic patients in a large urban city. This clinic serves as a transitional care clinic, providing integrated diabetes management and assisting patients to establish with other primary care doctors in the community once appropriate. The clinic uses an interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP) model with the RNCC at the center of patient onboarding, integrated responsive care, and clinic transitioning. Interprofessional, nurse-led clinic for uninsured patients with diabetes. Interprofessional models of care are strengthened using a specialized care coordinator. Care coordination is a key component in case management of a population with chronic disease. The RNCC, having specialized clinical expertise, is an essential member of the interdisciplinary team, contributing a wide range of resources to assist patients in achieving successful outcomes managing diabetes. Transitional care coordination, moving from unmanaged to managed diabetes care, is part of a bundled health care process fundamental to this clinic's IPCP model. In a transitional clinic setting, frequent interaction with patients through onboarding, routine check-ins, and warm handoff helps support and empower the patient to be engaged in their personal health care journey.

Patients' experiences of and roles in interprofessional collaborative practice in primary care: a constructivist grounded theory study.

This constructivist grounded theory study aimed to (1) explore patients' experiences of and roles in interprofessional collaborative practice for chronic conditions in primary care and (2) consider the relevance and alignment of an existing theoretical framework on patients' roles and based on the experiences of patient advocates. High-quality management of chronic conditions requires an interprofessional collaborative practice model of care considering an individual's mental, physical, and social health situation. Patients' experiences of this model in the primary care setting are relatively unknown. A constructivist grounded theory approach was taken. Interview data were collected from primary care patients with chronic conditions across Australia in August 2020 - February 2022. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed by (1) initial line-by-line coding, (2) focused coding, (3) memo writing, (4) categorisation, and (5) theme and sub-theme development. Themes and sub-themes were mapped against an existing theoretical framework to expand and confirm the results from a previous study with a similar research aim. Twenty adults with chronic conditions spanning physical disability, diabetes, heart disease, cancer, autoimmune, and mental health conditions participated. Two themes were developed: (1) Adapting to Change with two sub-themes describing how patients adapt to interprofessional team care and (2) Shifting across the spectrum of roles, with five sub-themes outlining the roles patients enact while receiving care. The findings suggest that patients' roles are highly variable and fluid in interprofessional collaborative practice, and further work is recommended to develop a resource to support greater patient engagement in interprofessional collaborative practice.

Impact of Initiating a GLP1 Agonist and/or SGLT2 Inhibitor Therapy on De-Escalation and Discontinuation of Insulin and Diabetes Control When Managed by an Interprofessional Collaborative Team.

An FQHC in Denver, Colorado developed and implemented an interprofessional care model to collaboratively manage type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Utilizing the 340B program, the team protocolized ADA Guidelines to promote the early adoption of first-line medications, glucagon-like peptide1 receptor agonists (GLP1 RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) to improve patient outcomes. To assess the impact of interprofessional collaborative management versus standard care on early initiation of a SGLT2i and/or GLP1 RA as first-line therapies to enhance (1) deprescribing of insulin, (2) reducing overbasalization of insulin through insulin de-escalation, and (3) effectively lowering A1C levels in adult primary care patients with T2DM. This was a retrospective chart review of adult patients with T2DM who were initiated on a GLP1 RA and/or a SGLT2i. To determine the effects of initiating GLP1 RA and/or SGLT2i therapy on insulin usage and glycemic control, the total daily dose (TDD) of insulin before initiation was compared with the most recent TDD post-initiation to evaluate deprescribing. To determine the impact on overbasalization, pre-initiation and post-initiation insulin doses were evaluated. The effectiveness of GLP1 RA and/or SGLT2i in lowering A1C levels was determined by comparing the A1C prior to initiation with the A1C postinitiation. To evaluate the influence of interprofessional collaborative care on insulin deprescribing, overbasalization, and diabetes control, relevant measures were compared between patients receiving collaborative care versus standard care. Of the 60 total patients treated with insulin, 46.6% were deprescribed insulin, with a majority in the interprofessional collaborative group (93.1%) compared to standard care (6.9%). A total of 78.3% of patients benefited from a reduction in A1C following the initiation of a GLP1 RA and/or SGLT2i. The greatest A1C reduction was -2.9% in the group receiving metformin in addition to a GLP1 RA and a SGLT2i. Patients who received interprofessional collaborative care had an average A1c reduction of -2.9% compared to-1.1% with standard care. Most patients initially overbasalized on insulin experienced a reduction in overbasalization after initiating GLP1 RA and/or SGLT2i. There was a notable A1C reduction, de-escalation, and deprescribing of insulin in patients receiving interprofessional collaborative care.

Pharmacists Colocated With Primary Care Physicians: Understanding Delivery of Interprofessional Primary Care.

While evidence supports interprofessional primary care models that include pharmacists, the extent to which pharmacists are working in primary care and the factors associated with colocation is unknown. This study aimed to analyze the physical colocation of pharmacists with primary care providers (PCPs) and examine predictors associated with colocation. This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of pharmacists and PCPs with individual National Provider Identifiers in the National Plan and Provider Enumeration System's database. Pharmacist and PCP practice addresses of the health care professionals were geocoded, and distances less than 0.1 miles were considered physically colocated. In all, 502,373 physicians and 221,534 pharmacists were included. When excluding hospital-based pharmacists, 1 in 10 (11%) pharmacists were colocated with a PCP. Pharmacists in urban settings were more likely to be colocated than those in rural areas (OR=1.32, CI: 1.26-1.38). Counties with the highest proportion of licensed pharmacists per 100,000 people in the county had higher colocation (OR=1.38, CI: 1.32-1.45). Colocation was significantly higher in states with an expanded scope of practice (OR 1.37, CI: 1.32-1.42) and those that have expanded Medicaid (OR 1.07, CI: 1.03-1.11). Colocated pharmacists more commonly worked in larger physician practices. Although including pharmacists on primary care teams improves clinical outcomes, reduces health care costs, and enhances patient and provider experience, colocation appears to be unevenly dispersed across the United States, with lower rates in rural areas. As the integration of pharmacists in primary care continues to expand, knowing the prevalence and facilitators of growth will be helpful to policymakers, researchers, and clinical administrators.

Clinical and Organizational Nursing Innovations in Primary Care: Findings From a Stakeholders' Symposium.

Nursing innovations in primary care, based on interprofessional care models, could be better identified, recognized, and deployed. This article presents the results of a symposium discussing the implementation of nursing innovations in primary care in Quebec, Canada, in partnership with researchers and stakeholders. Built on the appreciative inquiry approach, 9 nursing innovations were described. To support the implementation of such nursing innovations responding to current primary care issues and population needs, 4 recommendations emerged: the need to implement strategies to achieve optimal scope of practice for primary care nurses; the importance to develop funding and organizational models that support primary care nursing innovation; the need to enhance a collaborative and democratic governance open to innovation; and the opportunity to create partnerships with the research community and teaching institutions.

Evaluation of a pharmacist-led interprofessional chronic pain clinic in Canada.

Chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) is a common condition that affects individuals at a biopsychosocial level and can significantly impair function and quality of life. Referral to an interprofessional CNCP program is recommended for most patients; however, these clinics are limited in number and capacity. Expanding access by testing new service delivery models would be of value. The purpose of this study was to measure the impact of a new pharmacist-led, interprofessional model of care developed at the University of Saskatchewan Chronic Pain Clinic. A retrospective chart audit was conducted using data that included adult patients referred for CNCP management between May 2020 and December 2021. Medication use, overall health status (using the Clinical Global Impression of Change-Improvement [CGI-I] scale) and patient readiness to change (using the Transtheoretical Model) were measured 6 months after the initial appointment. The study included 138 patients. Of the 80 patients taking an opioid, 22.5% were switched to buprenorphine/naloxone and the remainder had their mean morphine-equivalent dose reduced by a mean of 41.7 mg/d. Overall patient health status was minimally improved and many patients moved into the Action stage of change. Changes in opioid use demonstrate a clinically important shift toward safer medication regimens that are less likely to lead to toxicity and unintended overdose. CGI-I data suggest that these patients, whose health status is typically very difficult to change, did not deteriorate but slightly improved after attending the clinic. The unique pharmacist-led, interprofessional model of care used by the University of Saskatchewan Chronic Pain Clinic may offer a viable alternative to traditional physician-led models.

Attitudes Toward Interprofessional Health Care Teams in a Regional Cancer Institute: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study

ObjectivesOncology is a rapidly changing clinical setting. Research has shown improved patient outcomes and staff satisfaction following interprofessional collaborative education, but there has been limited research on perceptions of interprofessional collaboration among oncology health care professionals. The aims of this study were to: 1) assess attitudes of health care professionals toward interprofessional teams in oncology care, and 2) assess for differences in attitudes across various demographic and workplace groups. Data SourcesThe research design was an electronic cross-sectional survey. The main instrument utilized was the Attitudes Toward Interprofessional Health Care Teams (ATIHCT) survey. A total of 187 oncology health care professionals from a regional New England cancer institute completed the survey. The ATIHCT mean score was high (M = 4.07, SD = 0.51). Analysis revealed statistically significant differences in mean score among participant age groups (P = .03). Significant differences (P = .01) were also noted between different professional groups and their time constraints sub-scale score on the ATIHCT scale. A higher mean score occurred in participants who had a current certification (M = 4.13, SD = 0.50) compared to those without (M = 4.05, SD = 0.46). ConclusionHigh overall scores in attitudes toward health care teams suggest that cancer care settings are primed for interprofessional care model implementation. Future studies should examine strategies to improve attitudes among specific groups. Implications for Nursing PracticeNurses are in a position to lead interprofessional teamwork in the clinical setting. Further research is necessary to examine best collaborative models in health care to support interprofessional teamwork.

Exploring the collaborative care of patients with pelvic fractures in Tshwane, South Africa.

Pelvic fractures are complex injuries that lead to long-term disabilities and poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Even though pelvic fractures are known to be challenging to manage, there is limited information on guidelines and protocols to ensure that patients receive comprehensive and collaborative healthcare. A qualitative descriptive phenomenological approach was utilised to explore current practices and innovations of healthcare professionals (HPs) in Tshwane academic hospitals in the collaborative management and rehabilitation of patients with pelvic fractures, using semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was used to analyse data. Six overarching themes were identified from the interviews with HPs: The biopsychosocial lens of the patient, limitations in approaches to care, contextual impediments to care, the team challenge; the biopsychosocial aspects of care and forging forward to improve care. A multidisciplinary approach is encouraged for the comprehensive management of pelvic fractures. However, a poor understanding of roles and poor referral structures challenge this approach. Further barriers to caring include staff shortages and limited resources. Healthcare professionals recommended interprofessional education and collaborative practice, student training and using standardised outcome measurement tools to improve care for patients with pelvic fractures.Contribution:This study lays a foundation to initiate conversations about the development of an interprofessional model of care for patients with pelvic fractures. Findings might inform health policies on the management of pelvic fractures. Healthcare professionals might apply strategies that enhance the quality of healthcare provided. Patients with pelvic fractures might receive quality interprofessional healthcare that promotes quality of life, post pelvic fractures.

Integration of the patient-centered medical home to deliver a care bundle for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease management

BackgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death globally and is projected to be the leading global cause of death in the next 15 years. Although best practices exist to improve outcomes for patients with COPD, delivering these interventions at scale remains a challenge. ObjectivesThis evaluation explores the impact of a COPD primary care bundle titled Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Coordinated Access to Reduce Exacerbations (COPD CARE) on patient outcomes. Primary objectives are (1) to determine 30-day readmission rates after discharge from the hospital and emergency department, (2) to evaluate patient access to primary care services after discharge, and (3) to measure incorporation of COPD best practices into routine clinical care. Practice descriptionThe current evaluation explores the impact of the COPD CARE service, an interprofessional primary care model that leverages pharmacists within the patient-centered medical home to deliver COPD management best practices. Pharmacists providing COPD CARE serve in a prescribing role to optimize medication therapy, order spirometry, place critical patient referrals, and coordinate patient follow-up. Practice innovationPharmacists delivering the COPD CARE service independently manage COPD as prescribers and coordinate provision of care with the primary care team. Evaluation methodsThis retrospective evaluation of the COPD CARE service occurred at 2 medical centers and 5 associated outpatient clinics within the Department of Veterans Affairs. ResultsA total of 118 patients completed the COPD CARE service, with no statistically significant differences in patient age, gender, race, tobacco use, or Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage between the COPD CARE and comparator group. Receipt of the COPD CARE service was associated with a 15% reduction in all-cause 30-day readmissions compared with TAU (COPD CARE, 14%; treatment as usual [TAU], 29%; P < 0.05). A total of 92% of patients enrolled in COPD CARE received primary care follow-up within 30 days of discharge compared with 49% in the comparator group (P < 0.001). ConclusionCOPD CARE participation resulted in greater access to health care, increased receipt of COPD management best practices, and readmission reduction.

"The Community That Takes Care of Itself": A Feasibility Study to Support Families Caring for a Loved One With Alzheimer Disease.

This pilot project was aimed at supporting those families caring at home for loved ones suffering from Alzheimer dementia. Fourteen dyads of "caregivers-loved ones with dementia" were recruited and assigned either to the experimental group (n = 7) or to the control group (n = 7). The experimental group attended a training course, an Alzheimer Café, a self-help group for caregivers, and the support from a volunteer and professional nurse in-home visits, while the control group's dyads attended a standard intervention. To investigate the effects of this integrated and interprofessional model of care, caregivers completed the Caregiver Burden Inventory and 2 ad hoc structured questions to evaluate whether quality of life of the dyads was changed. Moreover, the caregivers of the experimental group completed the Self-Assessment Single Questionnaire, version 6 (Q-UAV6). Only caregivers of the experimental group reported a significant reduction in burden and an improved quality of life of the dyad. They also showed a greater acceptance of the disease, became experts in the care of their loved ones, and improved their relationship. The creation of a service integration network of professionals, volunteers, and families has been shown to be useful in supporting those families caring at home for loved ones suffering from Alzheimer dementia.

A comparative cohort study of gastrointestinal oncology patients: Impact of a shift to telehealth on delivery of interprofessional cancer care.

Early studies of oncology visits performed via telehealth demonstrate patient and provider satisfaction; however, understanding of the impact of telehealth on clinic workflows is limited. The incorporation of telehealth visits into an interprofessional model of oncology care was evaluated to assess for changes in care delivery and patient engagement. New patients with a gastrointestinal cancer diagnosis who were actively undergoing treatment and followed for at least three months were divided into two cohorts based on telehealth utilization. Individual patient charts were reviewed by touchpoint, consisting of in-person visits, telehealth visits, phone calls, and patient portal messages. A total of 28 patient charts were analyzed, 11 pre-telehealth conventional care patients, and 17 telehealth patients. Telehealth cohort patients demonstrated an increased average number of total touchpoints when compared to the pre-telehealth cohort (p-value = 0.008) and had an increased number of patient portal and phone call touchpoints (p-value = 0.00 and  0.002). Telehealth provided more interactions between patients and providers demonstrating increased connectivity between a patient and their care team throughout their complex cancer journey. Clinic workflows may need to adjust to account for the increased demand of unscheduled patient interactions.

A Novel GPPAS Model: Guiding the Implementation of Antimicrobial Stewardship in Primary Care Utilising Collaboration between General Practitioners and Community Pharmacists

Interprofessional collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacists (CPs) is central to implement antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes in primary care. This study aimed to design a GP/pharmacist antimicrobial stewardship (GPPAS) model for primary care in Australia. An exploratory study design was followed that included seven studies conducted from 2017 to 2021 for the development of the GPPAS model. We generated secondary and primary evidence through a systematic review, a scoping review, a rapid review, nationwide surveys of Australian GPs and CPs including qualitative components, and a pilot study of a GPPAS submodel. All study evidence was synthesised, reviewed, merged, and triangulated to design the prototype GPPAS model using a Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety theoretical framework. The secondary evidence provided effective GPPAS interventions, and the primary evidence identified GP/CP interprofessional issues, challenges, and future needs for implementing GPPAS interventions. The framework of the GPPAS model informed five GPPAS implementation submodels to foster implementation of AMS education program, antimicrobial audits, diagnostic stewardship, delayed prescribing, and routine review of antimicrobial prescriptions, through improved GP–CP collaboration. The GPPAS model could be used globally as a guide for GPs and CPs to collaboratively optimise antimicrobial use in primary care. Implementation studies on the GPPAS model and submodels are required to integrate the GPPAS model into GP/pharmacist interprofessional care models in Australia for improving AMS in routine primary care.

Models of NP Integration into the Workflow of Primary Care Practices: A Systematic Review

Background Nurse practitioners (NPs) have been proposed as one solution to the U.S. primary care physician shortage, leading to a body of research on the appropriate scope of work for the new professional role of an NP within primary care practices. Yet, among studies of NP integration into patient care workflows, there is a lack of consistency in the terminology used to describe models of care. This work aims to provide more clarity around ill-defined and overlapping terms around NP integration into primary care and therefore advance the conversation around NP integration into the workflow of primary care practices. Methods A systematic review of articles on NP-physician interprofessional relationships and models of care was conducted to develop an inclusive overview of the academic literature on this topic. Results A total of 42 papers fit the inclusion criteria. The terms most frequently used to describe NP integration were collaboration, team-based approaches, and comanagement. Most papers used a combination of terms to describe a specific type of NP integration. Only 28 presented a thorough description of NP-physician interactions. Guided by theory, papers were categorized based on power structure (hierarchical vs. complementary) and processes of primary care provision (collaborative vs. siloed), leading to the identification of four distinct models of NP integration – complementary/collaborative, complementary/hierarchical, siloed/collaborative, and siloed/hierarchical. The most common categorization was complementary/collaborative. Conclusion This research highlights the lack of differentiation between terms currently used to describe NP integration into primary care and presents new labels that describe distinct models of care.

Scope of Iranian community health nurses 'services from the viewpoint of the managers and nurses: a content analysis study.

BackgroundConsidering the need for nurses specializing in community health and in order to define professional duties for future planning towards creating the position of community health nurses in the primary health care system of Iran, this study aims to explain the range of services which can be provided by community health nurses from the perspective of the mangers and nurses.MethodsThe present qualitative study was conducted with the approach of contract content analysis in Iran in 2020. This study was conducted through in-depth and semi-structured interviews with 22 participants, including community health nursing faculty members, health deputies and managers, community health nurses working in health centers, and the care seekers visiting comprehensive health centers. The samples were selected through purposeful sampling. The interviews continued until data saturation. Data analysis was performed simultaneously with data collection. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed through Graneheim & Lundman’s content analysis method, and data management was done using MAXQDA software. To achieve data trustworthiness, the criteria presented by Lincoln and Guba were used.ResultsThe obtained data were classified into the two main categories of service provision settings and service provision domains. The category service provision settings covered 7 subcategories including participation in the family physician plan, activities at the centers for vulnerable groups of the community, establishing private community health clinics, leading health promotion programs in the 3rd generation hospitals, activities in comprehensive health centers, follow-ups and home visits, and activities in schools’ health units. Service provision domains consisted of 6 subcategories including participation in health planning, decision-making, and policymaking, research on the health system, health promotion, monitoring and coordination, providing care for the patients with non-communicable diseases and high-risk groups, and eldercare.ConclusionsFrom the participants’ perspective, important services that can be provided by the community health nurse are health promotion, the management of chronic patients and the elderly, follow-ups, and home visits. Therefore, it is recommended that health policy makers pay attention to the service provision areas and the services providable by the community health nurse in their macro-planning, and to provide primary health care in comprehensive health centers using inter-professional care models, integrating the community health nurse into the care team.

Diabetes and Oral Health (DiabOH): The Perspectives of Primary Healthcare Providers in the Management of Diabetes and Periodontitis in China and Comparison with Those in Australia.

Diabetes and periodontal disease are highly prevalent conditions around the world with a bilateral causative relationship. Research suggests that interprofessional collaboration can improve care delivery and treatment outcomes. However, there continues to be little interprofessional management of these diseases. DiabOH research aims to develop an interprofessional diabetes and oral health care model for primary health care that would be globally applicable. Community medical practitioners (CMPs), community health nurses (CNs), and dentists in Shanghai were recruited to participate in online quantitative surveys. Response data of 76 CMPs, CNs, and dentists was analysed for descriptive statistics and compared with Australian data. Health professionals in China reported that, while screening for diabetes and periodontitis, increasing patient referral and improving interprofessional collaboration would be feasible, these were not within their scope of practice. Oral health screening was rarely conducted by CMPs or CNs, while dentists were not comfortable discussing diabetes with patients. Most participants believed that better collaboration would benefit patients. Chinese professionals concurred that interprofessional collaboration is vital for the improved management of diabetes and periodontitis. These views were similar in Melbourne, except that Shanghai health professionals held increased confidence in managing patients with diabetes and were more welcoming to increased oral health training.

957-P: A Community–Academic Practice Partnership to Optimize Outcomes in High-Risk Underserved Patients with Diabetes

Background: The project aims to establish an interprofessional diabetes team within a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) to increase patient access and improve the health of underserved patients with diabetes. Methods: The program is a community-academic practice partnership implemented in a FQHC in the Southeastern United States. The program utilizes an interprofessional diabetes care model (in-person and telehealth) with a nurse practitioner, pharmacist, population health specialist, certified medical assistant, dietician, and primary care team to provide comprehensive diabetes care focused on treatment optimization, self-management, and identification of medical and community resources. Results: A total of 175 patients were seen from November 2020 to October 2021. The median (IQR) A1C at baseline was 9.6% (8.4-11.5%) versus 8.6% (7.0-10.0%) at follow-up (p&amp;lt;0.001) . The median BMI decreased by 0.4 kg/m3. Improvements were noted in diabetes quality metrics (Table 1) . Patient, primary care provider, and student surveys demonstrate 100% satisfaction with the diabetes team. Conclusions: A community-academic practice partnership supports comprehensive diabetes management and improved health outcomes. Next steps include expansion of the program to additional practice sites and continued data analysis on patient outcomes, cost, and satisfaction. Disclosure T.O.Fowler: None. J.Sterrett: None. L.T.Collins: None. A.D.Poole: None. E.Weeda: None. R.A.Dubose-morris: None. K.Roever: None. Funding The Duke Endowment (6878-SP)

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a people-centred care model for community-living older people versus usual care ─ A randomised controlled trial.

There is a need for effective and cost-effective interprofessional care models that support older people to maintain their quality of life (QoL) and physical performance to live longer independently in their own homes. The objectives were to evaluate effectiveness, QoL and physical performance, and cost-utility of a people-centred care model (PCCM), including the contribution of clinically trained pharmacists, compared with that of usual care in primary care. A randomised controlled trial (RCT) with a two-year follow-up was conducted. The participants were multimorbid community-living older people, aged ≥75 years. The intervention comprised an at-home patient interview, health review, pharmacist-led clinical medication review, an interprofessional team meeting, and nurse-led care coordination and health support. At the baseline and at the 1-year and 2-year follow-ups, QoL (SF-36, 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey) and physical performance (SPPB, Short Performance Physical Battery) were measured. Additionally, a physical dimension component summary in the SF-36 was calculated. The SF-36 data were transformed into SF-6D scores to calculate quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Healthcare resource use were collected and transformed into costs. A healthcare payer perspective was adopted. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated, and one-way sensitivity analysis was performed. No statistically or clinically significant differences were observed between the usual care (n=126) and intervention group (n=151) patients in their QoL; at the 2-year follow-up the mean difference was -0.02, (95% CI -0.07; 0.04,p=0.56). While the mean difference between the groups in physical performance at the 2-year follow-up was -1.02, (-1.94;-0.10,p=0.03), between the physical component summary scores it was -7.3, (-15.2; 0.6,p=0.07). The ICER was -73 638€/QALY, hence, the developed PCCM dominated usual care, since it was more effective and less costly. The cost-utility analysis showed that the PCCM including pharmacist-led medication review dominated usual care. However, it had no effect on QoL and the effect towards physical performance remained unclear.

The neuron model: An educational tool for evidence-based practice and interprofessional care

Objective: The objective of the study was to assess the usefulness of the neuron model in educating how evidence-based drug information and interprofessional care interface.    Methods: The Neuron model of evidence-based practice and interprofessional care was introduced in an online session to a group of healthcare professionals at a United Arab Emirates (UAE) tertiary-level care hospital in March 2021. A Google Form survey was used to assess the usefulness of the neuron model.    Results: Among those who responded to the form, 90% of healthcare professionals said that the neuron model was useful. This agreement improved significantly (Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test p-value &gt; 0.05), and persisted even after six months.    Conclusion: The healthcare professionals agreed that the neuron model was beneficial in visualising how evidence-based practice and interprofessional care interface with each other, integrate into the academic health system, and help identify areas of improvement for healthcare professionals.